Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Questions about Christianity > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 9/24/2006 7:35 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
 
Yo!
 
(Note bold in second reference.)
 
 
READ:
 
 
AND:
 
The Lively God of Robert Jenson
by David B. Hart
Copyright (c) 2005 First Things 156 (October 2005): 28-34.
 
. . .  Jenson is an American (to be exact, a Minnesota Lutheran of Norwegian extraction, and of the “high church” variety). It is a prejudice widely held—but by no people more fervently than by Americans themselves—that it is not our calling as a nation to indulge in “primary discourse.” It is all well and good for an American theologian to write at length about (for instance) what German theologians might have to say about the Trinity, but it is something altogether different for him to write too boldly about the Trinity as such. We would not usually—as a rule—presume. Another reason, perhaps, is Jenson’s inveterate and perverse refusal to be dull. His books are not buttressed (as we know such things should be) by long, ponderous, Teutonic prolegomena on method or on critical history or on the status quaestionis; his scholarly apparatus rarely exceed what is necessary to support his assertions and are almost ascetically devoid of needless displays of exhaustive erudition; his method and peculiar concerns are typically disclosed in the act of theology itself, on the wing, and he tends to say what he wishes to say once only, and as concisely as he can.


(o)

Post Edited (PotOnWheel) : 9/24/2006 7:58:23 PM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 9/24/2006 8:10 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
WORTHWHILE....
 
THESE LINKS ARE LIVE!
 
 
...see Pannenberg’s review of Jenson’s Systematic Theology: A Trinitarian Synthesis. And in turn, see Jenson’s reviews of Pannenberg’s Systematic Theology: vol. 2 and vol. 3. (If Jenson reviewed the first volume, I cannot find it.)

For a good sample of Jenson’s approach to theological matters, see his lecture “What If It Were True?”

I do not think that Jenson would accept the suggestion that his theological reflections are driven by an idealist ontology. Rather, I think he would say that he is attempting to rethink a truly Christian metaphysic, a metaphysic as revealed by the gospel itself. He does not begin with Hegel. He begins with the death and resurrection of Jesus.


(o)

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 9/24/2006 11:29 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Well, I
________f i n a l l y
____________________finished Hart on Janson.

Very interesting.

D., take the long time necessary!

B.


(o)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 9/25/2006 10:49 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I'm on it.


"All is full of love."  -- Bjork
 
"God is love. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in them." -- 1 John 4:16b

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 9/25/2006 11:33 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Quoting Hart: "Perhaps the simplest thing one might say about Jenson’s theology is that it is a theology of the living God. "


Again, Hart: My principal reason, however, for thinking Jenson’s work so enormously important for serious theologians, or even just for reflective Christians who have had the good sense not to become theologians, has to do with the single great Christian mystery from which all theology arises: the mystery of the Person of Christ.

And again... : I should myself be candid and admit (in case I am—or will be—guilty of any inadvertent misrepresentations) that there is scarcely any aspect of the theological story I have just told with which I am not in profound disagreement—for reasons I believe to be at once biblical, doctrinal, philosophical, and historical. I write neither as a disciple of Jenson’s, nor as a “Jensonian,” but only as an admirer. But, for just this reason, I think I give myself license to declare something like perfect disinterest in the high claims I wish to make on Jenson’s behalf.
- WOW -
.
 
And, again, Hart: Here one need only direct the reader to Jenson’s work: there (especially in his Systematic Theology) one will find an account of the triune God drawing near to us—and of us drawing near to Him—of extraordinary richness, one that is (depending on one’s temperament or intellectual affiliations) either seductive or scandalous, but one that is also impossible to dismiss or forget.


(o)

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 9/29/2006 5:49 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
The Lively God of Robert Jenson
by David B. Hart
Copyright (c) 2005 First Things 156 (October 2005): 28-34.
 


(o)

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 1:22 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads