Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Questions about Christianity > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 12/11/2006 8:10 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Interesting chapter on 'art' posted here at opensourcetheology:
 
 
The arts as new creation
 

 


 

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 12/11/2006 9:10 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
 
In his lecture The Cross: Five Images of the Atonement, Bishop Kallistos Ware quoted the Jesuit, Robert Mowery, from the Roman Catholic tradition, this way:

"All theology starts with the human mind reaching out to evoke some echo or reflection of the ineffable by means of some poetic image of is, knowing that the ineffable cannot be pinned down. There follows a period of rising confidence in the intellects power, Then, of declining vision and confidence. Finally in decadence, an abject literalism, that can no longer distinguish the levels of discourse, and discern what was poetic imagery, what was philosophical symbolism, and what was matter-of-fact language. The peaks of philosophical poetry remain to inspire us again: Ephraim, Dante, Milton, Blake, T.S. Eliot. It would be good for the church if they were put more in the forefront of theological study." (Kallistos Ware would add from the Byzantine tradition, St. Simeon the New Theologian.)

And he quotes the Romanian theologian Fr. Demetroe Stanaloe this way:
 
"The mystery of salvation cannot be expressed except in the form of paradox. And Orthodoxy has therefore sought to safeguard the element of paradox against any attempt to unravel the mystery in a series of one-sided rational propositions. The paradoxical and apophatic fullness of the mystery of salvation is more genuinely suggested by symbols than by intellectual definitions. To consider the cross and the resurrection in images, to express them through symbolical and liturgical acts is to hint at this mystery of salvation in a way more real and more existential than is possible through Alselm’s Theory of Satisfaction, or the Penal Theory of the Protestants, which cannot express more than one aspect of the incomprehensible mystery of salvation. Such theories are acceptable only on condition that they do not claim to replace the mystery itself, in its incomprehensible fullness, but merely to expound some particular point, and that in a relative and provisional way."


(o)

Post Edited (PotOnWheel) : 12/11/2006 8:16:10 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 12/11/2006 9:18 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thanks for the topic, Tom.


(o)

Post Edited (PotOnWheel) : 12/11/2006 9:46:18 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 2:06 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads