Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Let’s solve the problem of evil > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

kingsaint
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2003
Total Posts : 80
 
   Posted 12/1/2009 11:26 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Scripture teaches us not to test God.  However, is it possible or advisable to blackmail the powers of evil.  Here is a contrived example to illustrate what I mean: imagine a person who is sensitive to the temptings of the powers of evil.  Now, this person resolves to contribute a substantial amount to her church offering every time she believes she is being tempted.  For the sake of argument, lets assume that money donated to her church is believed by the powers of evil to advance the kingdom of God, and this is so because monies donated to the church really do advance the kingdom of God.  The powers of evil are thus seemingly caught in a dilemma.  They can continue to tempt said person, in which case the kingdom of God advances, or they have to stop tempting said person, in which case the kingdom of God also advances.  Either way, the kingdom of God advances.  Now, the powers of evil may try to evade the dilemma by trying to guilt said person, they might say to her: "Why don't you contribute to the church without making it contingent on being tempted?"  However, this seems self-defeating because if they convince her to do this, then the kingdom of God advances.  She could also sense this strategy and contribute to the church to punish the powers of evil but the kingdom of God also advances.  So, it seems the forces of evil's only recourse is to choose the lesser of two evils (goods).  What make you of this?   


Be without fear in the face of your enemies
Be brave and upright
Speak the truth
Safeguard the helpless
That is your oath
 
---Godfrey of Ibelin

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 12/2/2009 1:52 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
James 1.14-15. Demons (or the powers of the Evil One--Satan and his demons) aren't responsible for our being tempted. It doesn't take a demon being around for us to be tempted, as if he they're not around we can't be tempted by evil to sin. So I'm struggling to make sense of the scenario.

But IF I go with the scenario, I think they'd tempt the guy, not caring whether he gives money or not. Then they tempt the church officials to spend the money on stupid stuff, like a big glass cathedral (price tag, $16M, yeah). Victory.

Tom


"Man is a person not by nature but by spirit. By nature he is only an individual." Nicolas Berdyaev

Back to Top
 

kingsaint
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2003
Total Posts : 80
 
   Posted 12/2/2009 7:38 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
You could simply replace "tempt" with "spiritually attack" however that might be conceived.  I guess I hadn't really thought about the machinations of temptation.  My views may stem from a conflation of temptation and tribulation "lead us not into temptation/test/tribulation" but "deliver us from evil/the evil one." My off-the-cuff reading of the James passage says that God doesn't test but that we are "drawn away" or "allured" by our own desire.  However, I'm not sure why the forces of evil cannot be involved in the drawing away and the alluring.  Also, my example doesn't hinge on it being true all the time that we are directly tempted by the forces of evil.  Be that as it may, lets change the example.  Let's say the deal involves volunteering at the church.  Let's assume the volunteering advances good.  This at least prevents the strategy of spiritually attacking the church to spend unwisely in the offering example.  


Be without fear in the face of your enemies
Be brave and upright
Speak the truth
Safeguard the helpless
That is your oath
 
---Godfrey of Ibelin

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 12/2/2009 12:20 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
So...

...this person resolves to volunteer time to some Kingdom building activity every time they're tempted or drawn toward some evil. Some, maybe even most, of the experienced temptations won't require the demons to be anywhere near him since temptation per se doesn't require the direct involvement of evil spirits. BUT, it might be the SOMETIMES evil spirits do directly seek to complicate and undermine our spiritual growth by drawing us aside into sinful distractions. So, the demons know that this guy has resolved to go build the Kingdom every time he feels drawn to evil. So they also know that this includes them. Should they seek to directly lure him into a bar, or to cheat on his tax return, or to stand too long at a news stand to gaze at the girly magazines...they know the result of their trying to tempt him will be him going down to the Church to donate time (say, at the soup kitchen, or passing out tracts with the youth group, or distributing food to poor people). If they don't want him to do those good things that build the Kingdom then they should refrain from directly seeking to persuade him toward any evil end.

Is that it?

Tom


"Man is a person not by nature but by spirit. By nature he is only an individual." Nicolas Berdyaev

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 12/2/2009 12:31 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
If that's it, then I'd say:

(a) This guy's resolve is itself a kind of misrelation. I mean, what's it say about somebody that they make their Kingdom service depend upon being tempted (even if they don't limit their service to those times when they feel tempted). If I was a demon and knew of such a case, I think I'd consider this man's resolve to already be the victorious result of some demon's work, and I'd move on. It seems to me that resolving to serve Christ when and because I'm tempted to sin is precisely the sort of warped approach to service and the Kingdom that demons are supposed to be encouraging.

(b) How seldom does this guy ever feel tempted? I mean, I'd have to LIVE in the Church building and do Kingdom work almost 24/7 if I vowed to do some Church-related service every time I experienced the draw and lure of the world. The rest of my life would be over.

(c) I think direct involvement on the part of evil spirits accounts for very little of the day to day misrelating of believers. Mabye I'm wrong. Maybe demons are everywhere all over all of us pushing and pulling to lure us into sin. But I doubt (for biblical reasons) that that's the case. Another reason why I'm having trouble imagining your case.

Just my 2 cents.

;o)


"Man is a person not by nature but by spirit. By nature he is only an individual." Nicolas Berdyaev

Back to Top
 

kingsaint
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2003
Total Posts : 80
 
   Posted 12/2/2009 2:25 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I bring up this case because I know a guy who claims to have practiced this strategy. In his case, he wanted to keep his car from breaking down. So he resolved that every time his car broke down he would donate the amount it took to fix his car to his church. He said that when he resolved to do this, his car never broke down again. I asked him why he would make donating to the church contingent on having his car break down. I didn't get a good response. So, I wondered if there is ever a case where a strategy like this can be used to defeat the powers of evil. It is sort of like putting the evil powers in a bind. I liken the case to putting God in a bind. Moses seemed to have noticed when God was in a bind and manipulated the situation accordingly when he pleaded with God not to destroy Israel otherwise God's reputation would have been diminished, which is perhaps why scripture says not to test God. Of course, Moses did not manipulate the situation that caused the bind. Could we imagine a situation where we could put the evil powers in a bind? My case seems to falter on the problem of not making doing good contingent on evil forces, but once one starts down that path, it seems the forces of evil are especially defeated, because though the person may opt out of actually resolving to make the deal, in so doing they commit themselves to serving at the church or whatever. So, the forces of evil would not like one to even start thinking about putting them in a bind because the only outcome is the resolve to do good, with or without the deal actually being made.


Be without fear in the face of your enemies
Be brave and upright
Speak the truth
Safeguard the helpless
That is your oath
 
---Godfrey of Ibelin

Back to Top
 

Daniel M
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2009
Total Posts : 263
 
   Posted 12/3/2009 1:19 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Hey Tom,

Tom: Then they tempt the church officials to spend the money on stupid stuff, like a big glass cathedral

Daniel: I'm still working my way through school, and I was a part of a Church that had a decently sized population, I'd say around 1,000 members. I asked the pastor if they did any sort of educational support for students. He tells me "nope, just not enough money in the budget to be helping all of the college kids." A few weeks later, the church spends close to 500,000 on a new set of projectors, sound systems, video equipment, wood paneling for the stage, ambiance projectors, etc. Now, I understand that a church needs some of these things, but this church already had 2 perfectly fine projectors, a really great sound system, and a video system that was better then the stuff at my school. But the newer equipment allowed them to "create a more dynamic environment for seekers to be exposed to the word of God."

I understand that a number of generations of college students had to work, take out insane loans, and work hard to pay off that debt. But I just don't get why the church would spend money on aesthetics rather than providing a much needed relief for its members. 500,000 could have went to help a lot of people.

Maybe, I'm just caught up in John Howard Yoders concept of an eschatological Jubilee fulfilled in the Church, where debt is abolished in all forms. But I can't help but think that the church (generally) could be doing A LOT to help people, especially in a recession. (I know there are Churches out there that ARE helping A LOT, but unfortunately, I have yet to encounter such a place).
Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 12/3/2009 3:28 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I hear ya Daniel. 500K is a butt load of money. Whew!

T


"Man is a person not by nature but by spirit. By nature he is only an individual." Nicolas Berdyaev

Back to Top
 

might-be-don
Registered Member


Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 830
 
   Posted 12/3/2009 3:22 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
"So he resolved that every time his car broke down he would donate the amount it took to fix his car to his church. He said that when he resolved to do this, his car never broke down again."

This appears to be more related to voodoo than christianity... my two cents.

peace, don


The world's perfect, wouldn't change a thing.
 

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 12/3/2009 3:44 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
"So he resolved that every time his car broke down he would donate the amount it took to fix his car to his church. He said that when he resolved to do this, his car never broke down again."

Wouldn't his vow to donate time to the church whenever his car broke down simply be an invitation to demons to shut down his the guy's ministry by saving him car expenses? Sounds like a good deal if I'm a demon. I mean, like I said, the guy's vow ITSELF is the sort of victory demons are looking for; "Fine, let's not screw with this guy's car in an attempt to get him to swear and lose his patience and we'll shut down all his volunteering at Church. In fact, I wanna a couple demons assigned to KEEP HIS CAR from random breakdowns that don't have anything to do with us demons. Let's keep this guy comfortable. Is he on our team or what?"

I think he ought to have resolved not to make his ministry to his local church dependent in any way upon when or if his car broke down. But I might be misunderstanding the whole thing.

Tom


"Man is a person not by nature but by spirit. By nature he is only an individual." Nicolas Berdyaev

Back to Top
 

kingsaint
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2003
Total Posts : 80
 
   Posted 12/3/2009 8:26 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Is it a clear cut case that this guy's vow is ITSELF what the demons are looking for? Let's say this guy reasons as follows: (1) Spiritual warfare exists. (2) warfare may involves strategy to defeat the opponant (3) I want to defeat the powers of evil (4) the "put evil forces in a bind" is a strategy to defeat the forces of evil (5) therefore, I will employ the "put evil forces in a bind" strategy. This is NOT like Pascal's wager were the decision seems totally based on game-theory and so would be the type of decision that would warrant our displeasure. William James criticised Pascal's wager for just this reason (he also pointed out why Pascal's wager failed--in so many words, there is a chance--even if infintely small-- that God may be Nietzschean and that he rewards NOT following the masses etc). As I see it the displeasure comes from withholding some good (that you ought to do anyway) in order to put the forces of evil in a bind. Let's add a premise: there is always SOMETHING extra that someone could resolve to do. That seems defensible: there is always one more penny you could drop in the Salvation Army bucket, there is always one more kid you could mentor, there is aways one more twenty buck bill you could tithe etc. Now, if the vow depends on withholding this something extra, then it doesn't seem as egregious. Now, you could say: "yes, but why don't you just do this extra thing without making it contingent on putting the forces of evil in a bind." I could, but I don't. It takes the "put evil forces in a bind" strategy to motivate the extra resolve. Now, it is true that I can be guilted into doing this extra thing without the forces of evil being forced to act on account of the bind, but then I have the "put evil forces in a bind" strategy to thank.


Be without fear in the face of your enemies
Be brave and upright
Speak the truth
Safeguard the helpless
That is your oath
 
---Godfrey of Ibelin

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 2:28 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads