Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Let’s solve the problem of evil > WAR sentiments...  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
165 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

SeanG
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2002
Total Posts : 278
 
   Posted 4/3/2003 7:20 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Rpeterso, good post, I was waiting for someone to bite on the line for me to post it. Also, in a briefing I watched on TV, Colin Powell said he very clearly explained to the 15 countries who voted yes on 1441 that those “serious consequences” meant military action!

The New York Times even quoted Powell as saying: "Don't vote for the first (resolution), unless you are prepared to vote for the second."

BBB, I am a pre-triber, and proud of it, am I whacked?


*****************


Edited by - SeanG on 04/03/2003 12:20:50 PM
Back to Top
 

SeanG
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2002
Total Posts : 278
 
   Posted 4/3/2003 7:42 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
An article I came across today in my normal rounds of news services.
quote:

Lifelong liberal, first amendment champion Nat Hentoff, who was in the forefront of protests against the Vietnam War, said Wednesday that many of today's Iraq war protests are being organized by "old line communists."

"Some of the main marches have been organized by people in the shadows, who support North Korea [and] who think China was right in the massacre at Tiananmen Square," the Village Voice columnist told WOR radio's Bob Grant.

Then Hentoff invoked the "C" word that mainstream reporters dare not speak. "[They] are old line, invincible - you know the term invincible ignorance - in terms of communism."

The left-wing writer noted also that some of the Iraq war protests have a decidedly anti-Israel flavor, telling Grant, "They wouldn't let Rabbi Lerner speak at one of their demonstrations because there are a lot of pro-Palestinians speaking at these demonstrations."

He went on to complain, "Why some of this didn't come out by some people who know the difference and don't agree with it - it besmirches much of the peace movement to have these people organizing it."



This article

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29524

is linked here for those who wish to see who has hijacked the “peace” movement. Careful, lots of truth and facts involved here, may be mind numbing for those who let their feelings guide their lives.


*****************


Edited by - SeanG on 04/03/2003 12:48:00 PM
Back to Top
 

BBBCanada
Registered Member




Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 2763
 
   Posted 4/3/2003 9:27 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Sean asked:

quote:
BBB, I am a pre-triber, and proud of it, am I whacked?


Yes.

Brandon
"Mommy, I know now that the terms, 'I'll knock yo' teeth down yo' throat!' meant you'd love me in the special way you do everyday of my life."--Darwin Hobbs
www.darwinhobbs.com
Back to Top
 

SeanG
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2002
Total Posts : 278
 
   Posted 4/3/2003 11:30 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
How soBBB?

Augustine said on the essentials – unity; on the non-essentials – liberty; but in all things - charity. (Rough quote.)

Is being pre-trib, post-trib, or otherwise enough in theological terms to call one whacked (not that whacked is a theological word, although, I wonder if it has a Latin root)? I am adamantly a young-earther (as most know). However, if one is a progressive creationists, or a theistic evolutionist, that person may be wrong in my eyes, but they are still going to heaven if their faith is in the blood of our savior. It is others who compare my faith in the infallibility of the bible with UFO’s and anti-Semitism, in one sense calling me whacked.

I realize you were probably just spouting off in fun, but if at any point you wish to discuss the subject, just holler.


*****************


Edited by - SeanG on 04/03/2003 4:33:12 PM

.

.

.

.


Oh! P. S., I neglected to show how ANGRY and ANTAGONISTIC I am, sorry Observer, here you go BBB, take this!!!!!!!!!

GRRR

GROOOWL

RUFF, RUFF

AAARRRGGHH

That will teach anyone to mess with BIG, BAD SEANG!


.









Edited by - SeanG on 04/03/2003 4:52:08 PM
Back to Top
 

SeanG
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2002
Total Posts : 278
 
   Posted 4/3/2003 12:25 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.



Back to Top
 

SeanG
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2002
Total Posts : 278
 
   Posted 4/3/2003 12:52 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.


quote:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,5944-631671,00.html

ILL-FEELING between Britain and France over the invasion of Iraq has plumbed new depths with the desecration of that most sacred of memorials, a war cemetery.

The defilement of Commonwealth war graves in northern France coincided with a poll for The Times which found that 54 per cent of Britons no longer regarded France as a close ally because of its opposition to the war.

Relations will be further rent by a second poll, in Le Monde, showing that only a third of the French felt that they were on the same side as the Americans and British, and that another third desired outright Iraqi victory over “les anglo-saxons”.

Eleven thousand Allied soldiers lie buried in well-tended peace at Etaples, on the Channel coast near Le Touquet, victims of the struggle by Anglo-Saxons to liberate the French from the German invaders during the First World War.

Last week the obelisk raised in their memory was defiled by red-painted insults such as “Rosbeefs go home”; “May Saddam prevail and spill your blood”; and, in a reference to the long-dead casualties beneath the manicured turf, “They are soiling our land”.

Local gendarmerie have launched an inquiry, but have so far found no clues. They say there had been no significant demonstrations against the war in that area of France.

The graffiti have been scrubbed off, but the incident has provoked outrage among British politicians, war graves staff and the few remaining relatives of those buried at Etaples. French politicians have joined the condemnation.

Bruce George, Labour chairman of the Commons Defence Committee, said: “Remembering what sacrifice these men made for the liberation of France, I cannot believe any mature, sane person would be so stupid as that.”

David Uffold, 63, a Shropshire farmer, is the only surviving relative of Rifleman Frederick Uffold of the London Regiment, who is buried at Etaples. “I find it sickening that anyone would vandalise the cemetery,” he said. “It is the last place they should be protesting about Iraq. These fellows were drafted in to fight for France. I can’t see any connection between the men buried at Etaples and the war in Iraq.”

Peter Francis, of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, said he was disgusted that a place remembering those who died defending freedom in world wars long ago should be dragged into a current political debate.

French politicians did their best to portray the desecration as an isolated act, but it nonetheless underlined anti-American and anti-British emotions running through France over what is seen there as a bungled invasion rapidly turning into a humanitarian disaster.

President Chirac’s spokesman said: “We are indignant and shocked by the desecration of the graves of soldiers who fought for our liberty.” Jean-Pierre Raffarin, the Prime Minister, said: “The Americans are not the enemy; just because we are against this war, it does not mean that we want the victory of dictatorship over democracy.”


Remember, in a very recent pole, one out of three Frenchies want Saddam Hussein to beat the American troops over there!



Back to Top
 

BBBCanada
Registered Member




Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 2763
 
   Posted 4/3/2003 2:50 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
How soBBB?


I was just playing with ya Sean. Until....I thought again when you said that you were proud of being a pre-tribber. How is one proud of their end-time eschatology? Here is what I was thinking. You asked if I thought you were whacked for believing in pretribulational rapture. I was joking when I said you were. Well, actually I was partly joking.

I have come to have a great deal of respect for some scholars who are dispensationalists. The reason why is because they don't buy into "newspaper eschatology." Most scholars don't anyhow. Now, if you separate yourself from those fringe groups, but still hold to a premillenial eschatology, I can respect that. But if you follow these end times scenarios about gloom and doom, you know, the Tim LaHaye stuff? The stuff that is born out of premillenial eschatology? Then you're whacked. Tim LaHaye, Jenkins, Lindsey, Impe? They're all spun. Just telling ya straight up. Course, I'm joking about the personal stuff, but I am serious about newspaper eschatology and their doomsday prophets.

Also, just remember that pre-trib is but one fraction of one millenial view out of a number of possible millenial views. Have you ever considered the other views and the possibility of the negativity of locking yourself into but one view?

Brandon
"Mommy, I know now that the terms, 'I'll knock yo' teeth down yo' throat!' meant you'd love me in the special way you do everyday of my life."--Darwin Hobbs
www.darwinhobbs.com

Edited by - BBBCanada on 04/03/2003 7:50:30 PM
Back to Top
 

SeanG
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2002
Total Posts : 278
 
   Posted 4/3/2003 5:07 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
As for other views, I have studied them in-depth, and I have always come back to the Lindsey’s and Tim Lahay’s. I have read quite a few books by many authors. I even attended a debate – moderated by Hugh Hewitt – at Biola that was a debate between a pre-triber and a preterist. That was very interesting.

I believe that Jesus second coming has more prophesies dealing with that time than his first coming. Making this an important study for any Christian. Just as I believe if one cannot get the first 11 chapters of genesis right (if those are myth, then why not Jesus resurrection), he or she will compromise on the word of God – not destroying his or her walk, but definitely inhibiting it. The same goes for the end-times. Albeit a secondary issue to our salvation, it seems important enough for God to include it within the realm of scripture. And to waiver on it is to miss out on a portion of our Christian understanding relating to His promise to return, which is the most awesomest promise ever!

By the by, do you feel I was angry enough at you to support Observer’s view that I am apparently out of control?

Its okay BBB, you can admit that you were terrified of me, no one here will slight you for it.





Back to Top
 

SeanG
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2002
Total Posts : 278
 
   Posted 4/4/2003 7:04 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Honorman, take special note that after Rpeterso posted the actual meaning of 1441, and I posted what Colin Powell specifically told the U. N. counsel, that once again, silence is the defining ring of the day. BBB and I are just passing the time by talking about eschatology and it’s apparent wackiness!

Oh, BBB, I posted a little something special to kick off a discussion about such things in Theological Q&A, FYI.

I wouldn’t want to clutter this post up more than I have with French flags and the like… hell, Dr. Boyd may wish to finally respond to some of the reasoned, well thought out responses to his pre-war statements about the French and German arguments (for not going to war) being better than the 45 plus nations that support the war.

What do you think Honorman? Was this too snippy for you Observer? I hope I won’t keep you up all night tossing and turning in your bed because I tend to be forward. Will I? Maybe the following idea will help clear things up for you Observer.

From a review of D’ Souza’s book, Letters to a Young Conservative:
    With a light touch, D`Souza shows that conservatism needn`t be stodgy or defensive, even though it is based on preserving the status quo. To the contrary, when a conservative has to expose basic liberal assumptions to scrutiny, he or she must become a kind of imaginative, fun-loving, forward-looking guerrilla--philosophically conservative but temperamentally radical.






Edited by - SeanG on 04/04/2003 12:06:03 PM
Back to Top
 

BBBCanada
Registered Member




Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 2763
 
   Posted 4/4/2003 7:38 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Oh, BBB, I posted a little something special to kick off a discussion about such things in Theological Q&A, FYI.


I'll check it. But in the mean time...

quote:
As for other views, I have studied them in-depth, and I have always come back to the Lindsey’s and Tim Lahay’s.


If I'm correct, you are saying that you studied the "other" eschatologies meaning mid-trib, post-trib, pre-wrath and the Wrath of Khan but you settled on Lindsey and LaHaye?

quote:
I believe that Jesus second coming has more prophesies dealing with that time than his first coming. Making this an important study for any Christian.

and

Albeit a secondary issue to our salvation, it seems important enough for God to include it within the realm of scripture. And to waiver on it is to miss out on a portion of our Christian understanding relating to His promise to return, which is the most awesomest promise ever!


Right. I don't have a problem with the study of eschatology. Its in scripture. I have a problem lading it with what we see happening in the world. Premillennialism is a spawning ground for such "Christian crystal ball gazing" or "newspaper eschatology." All such premillennial views (pre, mid, or post trib) do this. The pre-trib view is but one minute view WITHIN the premillennial view among all the millennial views out there, i.e. postmillennialism, dispensationalism, historic premillennialism and amillennialism.

It is one thing to hold to a particular eschatological view, but please don't load it with ever changing current events. Ugh...




Brandon
"Mommy, I know now that the terms, 'I'll knock yo' teeth down yo' throat!' meant you'd love me in the special way you do everyday of my life."--Darwin Hobbs
www.darwinhobbs.com
Back to Top
 

might-be-don
Registered Member


Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 830
 
   Posted 4/4/2003 8:03 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
...silence is the defining ring of the day.


Read the FAQ. All you have to do is outlast your debating opponent and you win.

peace and love(the touchy,feely kind today), don

---
"No Rules, just Right" Outback Steakhouse
Back to Top
 

honorman
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 1137
 
   Posted 4/4/2003 9:53 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Sean: considering that there have been no new responses (or answers) from the anti-war proponents silence does not surprise me. Plus, given that the war seems to be going better than expected and now that it seems to be closing to a close and it will soon be shown that the Iraq people wanted this all long, I think you will be hearing more silence. Like in Afghanstan, when everyone was saying how horrible it would be and how long it would take, once we secure Iraq and prove how wrong everyone was, the silence will be deadening.

Back to Top
 

SeanG
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2002
Total Posts : 278
 
   Posted 4/4/2003 3:36 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
The left was predicting a million dead in Afghanistan Honorman! (Hey, that rhymed.) Noam Chompsky was one, as well as many of your liberal senators and anti-Bush people. The U.N. predicted 500,000 thousand dead in Iraq, many of which would be U.S. soldiers. Nancy Pelosi just a day or three ago said thousands upon thousands of dead U.S. soldiers.

Doom and gloom, the cup is always half empty. Conservatism always views the cup half-full!

A group of liberal professors and many human-rights organizations are keeping a tally on the innocent people that have been killed in the crossfire, or used as shields… I believe it is up to about 500. Horrible, horrible stats! But if you consider every war prior, and the scope and depth of the bombing, and the amount of ground covered… man, this is the best stat that even the hardened critic can live with. How many Kurds and Shiites has Saddam killed in 10 years? Something like 300,000.

Clinton was so scarred of U.S. deaths in Kosovo, that he ordered the carpet-bombing of the area from 15,000 thousand feet. Any tallies on the innocent death toll during that campaign… no, why? Because a democrat was in office… not a republican.

Hypocrisy at its finest!!!

BBB, for the most part, i agree with your summation, and yes on your first question.


Later Skater!





Edited by - SeanG on 04/04/2003 8:42:47 PM
Back to Top
 

Themissinglint
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2
 
   Posted 4/8/2003 9:42 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

quote:

The left was predicting a million dead in Afghanistan Honorman! (Hey, that rhymed.) Noam Chompsky was one, as well as many of your liberal senators and anti-Bush people. The U.N. predicted 500,000 thousand dead in Iraq, many of which would be U.S. soldiers. Nancy Pelosi just a day or three ago said thousands upon thousands of dead U.S. soldiers.



You'll notice that casualty counts were never posted after Afghanistan.

quote:

Doom and gloom, the cup is always half empty. Conservatism always views the cup half-full!



yes, we librals see whats wrong, and try to fix it, instead of accepting everything as okay, and dropping into stagnation and decline.

quote:

A group of liberal professors and many human-rights organizations are keeping a tally on the innocent people that have been killed in the crossfire, or used as shields… I believe it is up to about 500. Horrible, horrible stats! But if you consider every war prior, and the scope and depth of the bombing, and the amount of ground covered… man, this is the best stat that even the hardened critic can live with. How many Kurds and Shiites has Saddam killed in 10 years? Something like 300,000.



IF you compare. But an evil is an evil, regardless of scale. IF those deaths, future deaths, could be prevented, they must be.

quote:

Clinton was so scarred of U.S. deaths in Kosovo, that he ordered the carpet-bombing of the area from 15,000 thousand feet. Any tallies on the innocent death toll during that campaign… no, why? Because a democrat was in office… not a republican.

Hypocrisy at its finest!!!



We heard about multiple carpet bombings in Afghanistan, and there have been no casualty counts there. At any rate, even if the present is better than the past, we should not decide that "the cup is half full" until thing are good.

Isaac §.
Back to Top
 

honorman
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 1137
 
   Posted 4/9/2003 5:55 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Issac: the simple fact is that if liberals are going to do "body counts" because they disagree with the war, then they should do it on both sides of the spectrum. As Sean pointed out there was no "uproar" when Clinton did the bombings, which leads one to the conclusion that it is more who is doing the bombing than whether or not the bombing is done. What also should be factored in is the fact that in Afghanistan and (as seen by the pictures today) Iraq, the people are welcoming US soldiers and are glad they are there.
So the events show that liberals are wrong in both cases, but that is okay. Because I am sure there will be other things you guys can whine about, yet take no action on.

..."until things are good..." live in the real world, Issac, not a idealistic fictional one. Sometimes there are hard choices to be made, made on the premise that things will only get worse through inaction. In the case of Iraq, liberal solutions were to fall back on non-solutions, things that have been tried for 12 years and never worked. In the real world there is a need for pragmatic decisions, not wishful thinking.


Edited by - honorman on 04/09/2003 10:59:25 AM
Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
165 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 7:46 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads