 |
| Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Let’s solve the problem of evil > Freedom to choose love outweighing evil... | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  John Earp Registered Member
 Date Joined Oct 2002 Total Posts : 1715 | Posted 6/19/2003 6:48 PM (GMT -6) |   | Below is an excerpt from an essay by Dr. Boyd, which eventually became a chapter in _Satan & the Problem of Evil_. I have highlighted the parts which speak to whether or not the OV teaches God has a plan or not.
(Begin Quote) :
In this light it makes perfect sense to speak of God taking risks in creating a world that is capable of love. While we are told in Scripture that the overall objectives of history are secure-the Lord shall certainly have a bride who will participate in his triune love-the fate of any one of his free creatures is necessarily insecure until that person chooses to enter into the saving covenant with God.9 This is the risk the Lord takes in creating a world like this.
If significant numbers of free agents (angels and humans) opt to rebel against him, and/or if crucially important, high ranking, morally responsible agents (such as Lucifer) decide to rebel against him, then the result will be a cosmos caught up in warfare. This is precisely what Scripture depicts as having occurred (cf. ch. I). We may believe on the basis of Scripture that God genuinely hoped this would not occur. And we may believe on the basis of Scripture that God is genuinely grieved by the fact that it did occur. But we may also be confident, again on the basis of Scripture that God knew of these possibilities and yet deemed the risk worth it. For the alternative is to have either no creation at all, or, what comes to almost the same thing, have a creation that was incapable of love.
Finally, on the basis of Scripture, we may be confident that the war shall come to an end and, whatever losses were suffered in the process, the Lord shall then reign victorious over his creation. His objective of acquiring a bride who reflects and participates in his unsurpassable triune love will then have been attained. As we saw above, we are all called to work and pray so as to speed up this victory.
The open view thus renders intelligible both the general control and the genuine openness, which the Bible ascribes to God when speaking about his relationship with history. I suspect it is the only view that does this with logical consistency. Entire article available at the following link:
http://twtministries.com/articles/9_openness/open.html
"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.
revivaltheology.net
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  GregBoyd Registered Member
 Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 1818 | Posted 6/22/2003 8:50 PM (GMT -6) |   | It's been argued that the OV is no better at explaining God allowing evil than classical Arminianism on the grounds that any reason God has for allowing evil WHILE its occuring can be given as a reason why God allows it BEFORE it occurs, knowing that it occurs. I disagree.
It's one thing to give a gift knowing there's a RISK it will be misused. Another thing to give it KNOWING it will be misused. If I give my kid a car, I know there's a risk she'll misuse it. If I was certain she would (say) go out that night, get drunk, and end up killing herself -- yet I gave her the car anyone -- NOW one has to question my character and wisdom.
In my view, God gave free will knowing there's a risk involved, but deeming the risk worth the gain. He allows us to use our free will as we choose, for that is what free will MEANS. If he revoked it when we were going to misuse it, he never gave it. I am not free to do "a or b" if my freedom is revoked when I'm going to do "b." So freedom must be in principle irrevocable.
If you accept that, you don't need to suppose that God has a specific reason for allowing every specific evil. If you suppose, however, that God foreknows the outcome of each specific misuse of freedom, now you DO need to suppose God has a specific reason for allowing every specific evil -- and therein lies the problem of evil. (Unless, of course, you hold the "simple foreknowledge" view that says that God knows the future, but knows it "too late" to do anything about it).
Greg
"The responsibility is with the chooser -- God is blameless." Plato, Republic, 10. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Leila Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2003 Total Posts : 93 | Posted 6/23/2003 6:05 AM (GMT -6) |   | GregBoyd wrote:
quote: It's one thing to give a gift knowing there's a RISK it will be misused. Another thing to give it KNOWING it will be misused. If I give my kid a car, I know there's a risk she'll misuse it. If I was certain she would (say) go out that night, get drunk, and end up killing herself -- yet I gave her the car anyone -- NOW one has to question my character and wisdom.
In my view, God gave free will knowing there's a risk involved, but deeming the risk worth the gain. He allows us to use our free will as we choose, for that is what free will MEANS. If he revoked it when we were going to misuse it, he never gave it. I am not free to do "a or b" if my freedom is revoked when I'm going to do "b." So freedom must be in principle irrevocable.
But assume the following scenario: Say you gave your child an old, unreliable, unsafe car to drive. And assume your child had no driving experience, is a very aggressive, risk-taking, impulsive type of person. So you hand her the keys to the car and she has an accident. Now you didn’t KNOW she would get into an accident, but you did KNOW her lack of experience, propensity for recklessness, shoddy condition of the car, etc. So obviously giving her a car in this situation is indeed questionable; that with all those known factors, your daughter was pretty much destined to have an accident.
What I am getting at is this: Isn’t this what God does when he grants CERTAIN PEOPLE freedom? We are obviously all not equally situated in life. Some people are born into such terrible circumstances -- totally innocent children are born into extreme poverty and neglect and have never known love; children are born to atheists, are brainwashed from an early age, and see only the hypocrisy and evildoings of so-called Christians, etc. Now of course there are instances where people overcome their circumstances and come to follow Jesus. But there are many more instances where this does not happen. Some say that their lot in life – and their eternal resting place – is merely the result of their own free choice. But aren’t their “free choices” in effect so constrained as to render the concept of “free will” – at least in their lives -- almost meaningless. And how does God get “off-the-hook” for allowing such innocents to be born into such unfair circumstances?
I would really like to come to an understanding and peace about this issue. It has been a huge stumbling block for me in my relatively new journey of faith.
Edited by - Leila on 06/23/2003 11:06:15 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  ReasonableDoubt Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 655 | Posted 6/23/2003 6:17 AM (GMT -6) |   | Laika raises a good point. The analogy possibly could work if everyone started out on the same playing field - but since obviously they don't - outcomes are affected.
Additionally, once God saw that humans for the most part do abuse their freedom - and cause much suffering and evil, what's the point of continuing on? He now knows that humans tend to choose to go their own way , are selfish and sinful, etc. I think all of us know with certainty that the next generation of people aren't going to be fundamentally different than the previous ones. So now God DOES know - and yet he continues to allow it to go on. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Laika Registered Member

Date Joined Mar 2003 Total Posts : 2433 | Posted 6/23/2003 6:31 AM (GMT -6) |   | ReasonableDoubt
quote:
Laika raises a good point.
That was Leila not Laika. Ones an attorney/stay at home mom, the other is a dog lost in space.
quote:
Additionally, once God saw that humans for the most part do abuse their freedom - and cause much suffering and evil, what's the point of continuing on? He now knows that humans tend to choose to go their own way , are selfish and sinful, etc. I think all of us know with certainty that the next generation of people aren't going to be fundamentally different than the previous ones. So now God DOES know - and yet he continues to allow it to go on.
So Satan is correct: 9 Then Satan answered the LORD, "Does Job fear God for nothing? 10 "Have You not made a hedge about him and his house and all that he has, on every side? You have blessed the work of his hands, and his possessions have increased in the land. 11 "But put forth Your hand now and touch all that he has; he will surely curse You to Your face."
God is only lovable because of his Santa Claus-ness? God should throw in the towel and admit defeat? To me, that's the crux of the argument. Satan says, "God, you can only force people to love you or buy their love". God says, "I'll prove you wrong by wooing people with love, not with gifts or threats."
The downside is that by giving people choice, many will choose the opposite. So is forcing everyone better than losing some to choice?

Edited by - Laika on 06/23/2003 11:38:57 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  ReasonableDoubt Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 655 | Posted 6/23/2003 6:42 AM (GMT -6) |   | I'm sorry - I meant Leila!
But Laika I don't follow you. If anything the story of Job showed that no matter what happened to JOb, he still worshipped God. God wasn't wooing him with love. Far from it! How can you say love was shown when all of his possessions and family were taken from him? He still followed God DESPITE this. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  ReasonableDoubt Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 655 | Posted 6/23/2003 6:58 AM (GMT -6) |   | AND, in JOb we see that God allowed Satan to have his way with Job. He pretty much told Satan- go ahead and do whatever you want to him (except kill him) and I know that he will STILL follow me. So God was in charge. Are you saying that God couldn't prevent Satan from inflicting harm? Or that he didn't know? Of course not- it was God who allowed and ordained it. I don't know where it is in the OT is says "The Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away- blessed be the name of the Lord." And in the Jewish religion, they have always guarded against people thinking that they were in control - or that they created life - God alone does that. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Laika Registered Member

Date Joined Mar 2003 Total Posts : 2433 | Posted 6/23/2003 7:07 AM (GMT -6) |   | ReasonableDoubt
quote:
But Laika I don't follow you. If anything the story of Job showed that no matter what happened to JOb, he still worshipped God. God wasn't wooing him with love. Far from it! How can you say love was shown when all of his possessions and family were taken from him? He still followed God DESPITE this.
I guess I see Job loving God simply because He's worthy of it. God does give us gifts and woos us that way as well. But there are times when (think Pastor Wurmbrand in a communist prison, etc.) we have the opportunity to show Satan that God is worthy of our love just for who He is, no gifts necessary. I think Satan's "original" sin was thinking God's rule is based on force and trying to wrench control from God that way.
You wonder why God doesn't call "game over" in the middle just because it appears the game isn't going His way. That would forfeit the game.
 | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Laika Registered Member

Date Joined Mar 2003 Total Posts : 2433 | Posted 6/23/2003 7:10 AM (GMT -6) |   | ReasonableDoubt
quote:
AND, in JOb we see that God allowed Satan to have his way with Job. He pretty much told Satan- go ahead and do whatever you want to him (except kill him) and I know that he will STILL follow me. So God was in charge. Are you saying that God couldn't prevent Satan from inflicting harm? Or that he didn't know? Of course not- it was God who allowed and ordained it.
Yes! God sets limits on Satan. What God can't control is Job's response. It was a REAL victory.
 | | Back to Top | | |
 |  ReasonableDoubt Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 655 | Posted 6/23/2003 7:16 AM (GMT -6) |   | My interpretation is that God indeed knew that Job would still worship him.
And - I don't believe that the game is not going according to plan. I believe it is going according to God's plan. For the OV'ers- you seem to say it is not going the way God wants it to - but to stop it would be to forfeit the game. So what would be so wrong about stopping it if it's so bad and out of control? Couldn't God just do that? If he REALLY did not know for sure what possibilities would obtain, once it gets going and he starts to see what's going on, if it's not what he wants certainly he could stop it. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  ReasonableDoubt Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 655 | Posted 6/23/2003 7:25 AM (GMT -6) |   | In the last chapter of Job, he says: "Then Job replied to the LORD :
2 "I know that you can do all things; no plan of yours can be thwarted. "
Sounds like Job believed God was in control all along.
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Laika Registered Member

Date Joined Mar 2003 Total Posts : 2433 | Posted 6/23/2003 7:48 AM (GMT -6) |   | ReasonableDoubt
quote:
In the last chapter of Job, he says: "Then Job replied to the LORD :
2 "I know that you can do all things; no plan of yours can be thwarted. "
Sounds like Job believed God was in control all along.
That's our differences. We both believe God's ultimate purpose will be accomplished. We differ on each person's participation in that. You believe God caused Job's responses, yet the scripture shows the limit of God's active control of Job, i.e. the good things given and the hedge. That's what Satan wanted God to remove, the things God could remove. The rest was in Job's hands. "Remove your influences, God, and leave Job on his own" is what Satan requested. Beyond that, the responses were totally up to Job.
Plus, Job doesn't have the perspective we have. We see who is really causing the evil that befell him.

Edited by - Laika on 06/23/2003 12:56:02 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Laika Registered Member

Date Joined Mar 2003 Total Posts : 2433 | Posted 6/23/2003 7:50 AM (GMT -6) |   | ReasonableDoubt
quote:
My interpretation is that God indeed knew that Job would still worship him.
Yes, because they had a relationship. Not because God would cause it. I know how my wife will respond to certain situations, not because I can cause those responses.
 | | Back to Top | | |
 |  ReasonableDoubt Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 655 | Posted 6/23/2003 8:02 AM (GMT -6) |   | | Without being an Old Testament scholar - here's what I think of it. The whole point of the book is that God is in control of what happens to us, good and bad. And that we are not in a position to - "curse God and die"- that God allows things to happen to us not because of what we have done, necessarily. For Job was a righteous man, and yet God still allowed all these bad things to happen to him. The book is not so much about Job's choice to still worship God, as it is about showing how God controls all things- and that we as humans have no standing to complain about it - if you read the last couple chapters- God goes on and on about how he controls the universe- "Where were you when I laid the foundations," etc etc. Saying how he controls the animals - basically, how his wisdom controls, and that Job is nothing even close to God, so that he cannot question or complain to God. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Laika Registered Member

Date Joined Mar 2003 Total Posts : 2433 | Posted 6/23/2003 8:13 AM (GMT -6) |   | ReasonableDoubt
quote:
Without being an Old Testament scholar - here's what I think of it. The whole point of the book is that God is in control of what happens to us, good and bad. And that we are not in a position to - "curse God and die"- that God allows things to happen to us not because of what we have done, necessarily. For Job was a righteous man, and yet God still allowed all these bad things to happen to him. The book is not so much about Job's choice to still worship God, as it is about showing how God controls all things- and that we as humans have no standing to complain about it - if you read the last couple chapters- God goes on and on about how he controls the universe- "Where were you when I laid the foundations," etc etc. Saying how he controls the animals - basically, how his wisdom controls, and that Job is nothing even close to God, so that he cannot question or complain to God.
But also read the advice Job gets from his three "counselors" about how man cannot stand before God, or question God, etc. God says those three all spoke wrongly about Himself. I believe, like Job, like Abraham, like David, like Jacob, we CAN reason with God. We can complain to God, we CAN question God. We can wrestle with God. We CAN prevail in prayer, etc. That's what a relationship is all about.
Look what Bildad, the Calvinist, said: "How then can a man be just with God? Or how can he be clean who is born of woman?"
God's take on this: "My wrath is kindled against you and against your two friends, because you have not spoken of Me what is right as My servant Job has."
Who can stand before God? Job could.

Edited by - Laika on 06/23/2003 1:17:30 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  ReasonableDoubt Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 655 | Posted 6/23/2003 8:17 AM (GMT -6) |   |
Job 40 1 The LORD said to Job:
2 "Will the one who contends with the Almighty correct him? Let him who accuses God answer him!"
3 Then Job answered the LORD :
4 "I am unworthy-how can I reply to you? I put my hand over my mouth. 5 I spoke once, but I have no answer- twice, but I will say no more."
6 Then the LORD spoke to Job out of the storm:
7 "Brace yourself like a man; I will question you, and you shall answer me.
8 "Would you discredit my justice? Would you condemn me to justify yourself? 9 Do you have an arm like God's, and can your voice thunder like his? 10 Then adorn yourself with glory and splendor, and clothe yourself in honor and majesty. 11 Unleash the fury of your wrath, look at every proud man and bring him low, 12 look at every proud man and humble him, crush the wicked where they stand. 13 Bury them all in the dust together; shroud their faces in the grave. 14 Then I myself will admit to you that your own right hand can save you.
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Laika Registered Member

Date Joined Mar 2003 Total Posts : 2433 | Posted 6/23/2003 8:27 AM (GMT -6) |   | O.K., now tie that in with the rest of the book: the evil coming from Satan, God removing His influences on Job, the bad testimony of Job's friends and God's testimony that Job was a blameless man and that he had spoken correctly about God.
The lessons I get from Job are: 1. evil comes from Satan, not God 2. we CAN stand before God and make our case, "let us REASON together" says the Lord 3. Job's blamelessness (God's testimony) came from his making continual sacrifices plus his knowledge that those were not enough, that God, Himself, would have to provide the final sacrifice "I know that my redeemer lives and will one day take his stand on the earth"

Edited by - Laika on 06/23/2003 1:44:19 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  might-be-don Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 830 | Posted 6/23/2003 8:28 AM (GMT -6) |   | RD says:
quote: So what would be so wrong about stopping it if it's so bad and out of control? Couldn't God just do that? If he REALLY did not know for sure what possibilities would obtain, once it gets going and he starts to see what's going on, if it's not what he wants certainly he could stop it.
Well... He sorta promised He wouldn't stop it. Remember the flood?
peace and love, don
--- "You cannot step twice into the same river; for fresh waters are ever flowing in upon you." Heraclitus | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Christian Registered Member
 Date Joined May 2003 Total Posts : 78 | Posted 6/23/2003 3:05 PM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
 |  ReasonableDoubt Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 655 | Posted 6/23/2003 7:27 PM (GMT -6) |   | Bildad a Calvinist - afraid that would have been news to him! :) But seriously, Judaism does not teach original sin - and it does teach free will- but also teaches that God is in control - and that nothing is done without God's will. I think of it as a modified Arminianism, sort of - but the point is that the book of JOb is not about free will - even though Judaism has no argument with that. It's about God's sovereignty and His right to do what he wishes. Most people then, and even today, would think if you did well and worshiped God truthfully, you should have a decent life. You should not be tortured. The book of Job turns this on its head. It shows that suffering can be of God (mind you, I didn't say FROM God - but that it was God's will that Job be treated the way he was) - and what is Job's answer, but that the Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away - blessed be the name of the lord. I don't believe that questioning is wrong - in fact I encourage it. But God has the right to say, who are you to judge what I am doing? You are a created being, I am the almighty.' Laika, when you keep making analogies to a spousal relationship, I get very uncomfortable. B/c like I said before- a marriage is between two humans - between two equals. There's no way that you can predict what your wife will do completely - and neither can you control much about her. But how does this compute with our relationship with God? Even if God chooses NOT to control a certain situation, it certainly is within his power to do so if he so chooses. He can use evil if he so chooses, as the book of Job shows. You seem to be equating the traditional view of God with a puppeteer in heaven, controlling every move. I don't think that - rather I think of God as the OVerall controller - of the big picture, so to speak. Nothing happens outside his watch . He's aware of everything going on, every intent, every contingency. Therefore, whatever does happen, he knows about it, and he allows it. If he chose not to allow it, it wouldn't happen. Anyway. I'll sign off now - i don't think either side has convinced the other of its veracity , and it seems to be an exercise in futility. I respect what you believe and your right to believe it, but I am just tired of arguing (for now, at least). | | Back to Top | | |
 |  ReasonableDoubt Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 655 | Posted 6/23/2003 7:32 PM (GMT -6) |   | | As far as the Flood - when do they surmise that happened -about 4000+ years ago? So God may have succeeded in wiping out evil for a time, but shortly thereafter, it arose again. (Noah in his drunken debauchery in front of his sons comes to mind, for one...). It may have accomplished God's purpose at that time, but since then, what? It's still going on, as bad, if not worse, than ever. In my mind, either GOd has a reason for it, or he's just along for the ride like the rest of us. So God made a promise after the flood never to send another flood like before. Well, why? Either he knew what he was doing to make such a statement, or else he didn't know that evil was going to get just as bad as before, and he was at best negligent to make such a statement. I prefer that it was all part of the plan. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  might-be-don Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 830 | Posted 6/24/2003 1:33 AM (GMT -6) |   | RD says:quote: In my mind, either GOd has a reason for it, or he's just along for the ride like the rest of us.
I think you need to add another "or" , he's along for the ride, but *not* just like the rest of us. After all, He is God.
peace and love, don
--- "You cannot step twice into the same river; for fresh waters are ever flowing in upon you." Heraclitus | | Back to Top | | |
 | 147 posts in this thread. Viewing Page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 | | Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 8:02 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|