 |
| Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Let’s solve the problem of evil > Congress is not cracking down on Tax-Evasion... | Forum Quick Jump
|
| 
DLW
Registered Member
Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2457
| Posted 10/20/2003 8:55 AM (GMT -6) |   | It seems that congress is not being very forthcoming in allocating the resources that the IRS needs to corner tax-cheats and are costing the rest of us a considerable amount of tax-revenue/additional debts/future taxes.
dlw
>
>This article from NYTimes.com
>has been sent to you by wetzelld@pilot.msu.edu.
>
>
>/-------------------- advertisement ----------------------->
>FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION: IN AMERICA - IN THEATRES NOVEMBER 26
>
>Fox Searchlight Pictures proudly presents IN AMERICA
>directed by Academy Award(R) Nominee Jim Sheridan (My Left
>Foot and In The Name of the Father). IN AMERICA stars Samantha
>Morton, Paddy Considine and Djimon Hounsou. For more info:
>http://www.foxsearchlight.com/inamerica
>
>\----------------------------------------------------------/
>
>Crackdown on Tax Cheats Not Working, Panel Says
>
>October 20, 2003
> By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
>
>
>
>
>
>On Tuesday the Senate Finance Committee will hold hearings
>on tax shelters that, committee aides said, will feature
>testimony that tax cheating continues unabated and that the
>numerous crackdowns announced over the past two years by
>the Internal Revenue Service have had almost no impact.
>
>The committee's leaders, Senators Charles E. Grassley,
>Republican of Iowa, and Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana,
>have been frustrated by their inability to get Congress to
>finance a serious assault on tax cheats, aides said
>yesterday. This hearing, which will feature a witness
>hidden behind a screen with his voice altered, is intended,
>in part, as a well-aimed kick in that direction.
>
>In the aftermath of corporate scandals that emerged two
>years ago, Congress enacted changes and increased by a
>third the Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement
>budget, but it did not pass any laws to attack abusive tax
>shelters or finance a serious hunt for tax cheats.
>
>A consultant's report, prepared for the I.R.S., but kept
>secret by the agency until now, is expected to show that
>corporate tax cheating in 2000 cost the government $14
>billion to $18 billion.
>
>Witnesses will tell how auditors have been driven from
>their jobs at the big accounting firms for refusing to go
>along with crooked corporate tax schemes and how some rich
>individuals were lured into frauds by big accounting firms
>that sold tax shelters that they promoted as perfectly
>legal.
>
>"Some progress has been made, and some are starting to get
>religion, but numbers of cheats are great and the odds of
>being detected are small,'' one aide said.
>
>As a result many businesses and individuals are breaking
>the law because their risk of detection is small and even
>if they are caught they are unlikely to be punished or even
>made to pay the taxes.
>
>Instead of voting for more funds to enforce the law,
>Congress has tightly restricted I.R.S. spending on
>auditors, criminal investigators, training and new
>technology while many of the agency's most qualified
>auditors have left in the past five years. The I.R.S. is
>budgeted for 6.6 percent more funds for all of its law
>enforcement activities this year, compared with a 38
>percent increase for suppression of fraud at the Securities
>and Exchange Commission and a 49 percent increase for the
>federal government's corporate fraud task force.
>
>Typically Congress gives the I.R.S. about 1.5 percent less
>money than the president's budget proposes, Mark W.
>Everson, the I.R.S. commissioner, said this month.
>
>"Unlike the S.E.C. and other enforcement agencies, our
>budget doesn't get topped off,'' said Mr. Everson, who said
>he believed that the sharp drop in prosecutions, especially
>high profile prosecutions, had emboldened many tax cheats.
>
>About eight of 10 known tax cheats are let go without
>having to even pay the taxes, interest or penalties. The
>former commissioner, Charles O. Rossotti, said the agency
>needed 29,000 more auditors and investigators to curtail
>cheating.
>
>The crackdowns on abusive tax shelters, offshore accounts
>and promoters who claim they have found legal ways to
>eliminate taxes are "funded by moving people from one unit
>in the I.R.S. to another, by robbing Peter to pay Paul,''
>one aide said.
>
>The consultant's estimate of up to $18 billion of abusive
>tax sheltering may be conservative because it is based on
>indicators of tax cheating that could be detected through
>statistical analysis, rather than active investigation of
>cheating that is designed to slip past I.R.S. computer
>screening programs. For example, the major accounting firms
>have sold tax shelters that use multilayered partnerships
>so that the figures that flow from the bottom layer onto
>corporate or individual tax return appear proper. The
>I.R.S. only audits one in 400 partnership returns, making
>them an efficient vehicle for tax cheats, especially when
>used in layers.
>
>One witness is scheduled to appear behind a screen, his
>voice altered, a tactic usually reserved for Mafia
>turncoats, spies and in 1997 for some I.R.S. agents who
>feared the loss of their jobs for speaking out. The leasing
>expert is being shielded because of fear by security
>advisers to the committee that "if his name became public
>it would not be healthy for him.''
>
>Whether that is hyperbole, or some of the clients he has
>worked are willing to do more than cheat on their taxes, it
>is sure to create a dramatic scene for television cameras
>and focus attention on issues that the two senators want
>their colleagues to treat more seriously.
>
>Another accountant, Michael Hamersley of Los Angeles, is
>also expected to testify that when he refused to certify a
>client's books after seeing what he thought was a fraud, he
>was fired by KPMG, the big accounting firm.
>
>"Despite KPMG's stated 'Core Value' of 'Open and Honest
>Communication,' such commentary was not often well received
>by Tax practice management,'' according to a lawsuit Mr.
>Hamersley filed in June in Los Angeles County Superior
>Court. "In fact, individuals expressing doubts about the
>technical merits of a tax shelter or the specific
>circumstances under which it was implemented were routinely
>chastised for not being a 'team player.' " An important
>issue at the hearing will be whether he names the client
>company, which is not identified in his lawsuit.
>
>George Ledwith, a KPMG spokesman, said yesterday that the
>firm thought that "the work for the client referred to in
>the complaint was performed in accordance with professional
>standards, and we firmly stand behind it.'' He
>characterized Mr. Hamersley as someone with "limited audit
>engagement experience.''
>
>The lead witness will be Senator Carl Levin, the Michigan
>Democrat who serves on the Senate Permanent Investigations
>subcommittee. He will introduce a bill next week that would
>prohibit accounting firms from selling tax shelters to
>publicly traded companies whose books they audit. Senator
>Levin says selling shelters to audit clients poses a
>conflict of interest because the auditors have no interest
>in disavowing the tax cheating that is enabled by their
>shelters.
>
>Senator Levin said yesterday that this week's "hearing
>ought to provide a real boost to the finance committee's
>critically needed legislation strengthening federal law
>against the peddling of abusive tax shelters.''
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/20/business/20tax.html?ex=1067668075&ei=1&en=6b03f4565758bcb4
>
>
>---------------------------------
>
>Get Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper. Imagine
>reading The New York Times any time & anywhere you like!
>Leisurely catch up on events & expand your horizons. Enjoy
>now for 50% off Home Delivery! Click here:
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/ads/nytcirc/index.html
>
>
>
>HOW TO ADVERTISE
>---------------------------------
>For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
>or other creative advertising opportunities with The
>New York Times on the Web, please contact
>onlinesales@nytimes.com or visit our online media
>kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo
>
>For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
>help@nytimes.com.
>
>Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company
>
Niebuhr thought that sustained moral energy in politics depended on religion's power to mobilize reason along with self-transcending love. The prophetic tradition, meanwhile, gave Jews and Christians some protection against the temptation to identify their social causes with God's will. Lincoln's second inaugural address expressed the prophetic insight, "The almighty has His own purposes." | | Back to Top | | |
 | Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 10:52 AM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3
dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|