Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Let’s solve the problem of evil > Define Sovereignty  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

selah
Registered Member




Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 1210
 
   Posted 5/3/2006 5:28 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
This is a call to everyone and anyone ...



What does the bible mean when it says God is "sovereign?"

What do we mean when we say we believe in God's sovereignty?


Please give me your definition.


THANKS!
selah

--
"When we acknowledge that all of life is sacred and that each act is an act of
choice and therefore sacred, then life is a sacred dance lived consciously each
moment. When we live at this level, we participate in the creation of a better
world."

Scout Cloud Lee



UPDATED FOR p.O.w ;-)

Post Edited (selah) : 5/4/2006 6:28:53 AM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

Sir_Edward
Registered Member




Date Joined Oct 2005
Total Posts : 66
 
   Posted 5/3/2006 6:11 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
The dictionary definition would be something like: "Possessing supreme power unlimited in extent and enjoying autonomy".

My definition for God: "God's ability to create, rule and order the universe as he see fit in absolute freedom"

It the last part that people seem to miss -- the freedom to act as he chooses. To create, order and rule as he chooses. Now I don't beleive God will do anything against his character, but at the same time there area lot of different worlds he could create, orders he could set up and decisions he could make within this idea. I dislike it when people say -- "God MUST do this or that" when it comes ot his sovereignty. God MUST do nothing he is free from our 'musts' because he is sovereign. We are not free from his commands (we can disobey them, but that means God can sovereignly punish or in his sovereignty show mercy) but He does not have to do a blessed thing we tell him. He desires to but I feel he often does not because we have not earned the favor of God. Like earning the favor of a king you don't just get it by showing up. God has the power to act as He chooses and the freedom to change his mind when needed.

Blessings.


Sir_Edward -- Knight of the Theological Roundtable - 2 Timothy 4:1-5

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 5/3/2006 11:06 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Ed-

I generally take sovereignty to refer to God's "managing/administration of" Creation. That administration is directed under and informed by God's own purposes for Creation. I like Ed's emphasis upon freedom. Sovereignty doesn't have to mean absolute unilateral control. It has to include God's freedom to do things as he desires (so long as they're no logically impossible or incompatible with his character).

So I'd just say divine sovereignty is: God's free and purposeful administration of and involvement in Creation.

Tom


 

Back to Top
 

Corey
Five with a Four-wing




Date Joined Feb 2003
Total Posts : 1893
 
   Posted 5/3/2006 12:02 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
To tie this in to our other discussion on omniscience, I've been thinking of sovereignty in terms of "unilateral boundary-setting." God has unilaterally decreed the limits of what is possible (closely related to creaturely freedom) in this world. I understand 'sovereignty' to be a repudiation of any "yin/yang" sort of dualism where God and non-God eternally exist in necessary tension. God is completely free to establish the boundaries as he sees fit for this world. Note that this does not in any way endorse meticulous control over the contents within those boundaries (though it certainly doesn't rule out God's pull and influence toward his teleological ideal.)

Back to Top
 

Alan Rhoda
Registered Member




Date Joined May 2002
Total Posts : 680
 
   Posted 5/3/2006 12:56 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Divine sovereignty = God has the absolute authority and power to do whatever he wants with creation (subject, of course, to whatever constraints are supplied by his nature, such as being Perfect Love, being necessarily rational and logically consistent, etc.).

If God wants a world in which he exercises meticulous control, he can have it - but not without logically foregoing the possibility of genuine loving relationships with his creatures.

In line with Corey's idea of 'unilateral boundary-setting', I'd say that the future is exactly as open/settled as God wants it to be.


Grammar must be based in logic, logic in ontology, ontology in onto-theology.
-- Bill Vallicella

Back to Top
 

might-be-don
Registered Member


Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 830
 
   Posted 5/3/2006 1:16 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Seems interesting that we qualify what God "wants". Can't we just say, absolute authority and power to do whatever he wants . Why would he "want" to do anything outside of his nature ?


The world's perfect, wouldn't change a thing.
 

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 5/3/2006 5:11 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
On a role, Selah...

S. Asked "What does the bible mean when it says "God is sovereign?""

Where does it say "that?" Specifically.

What would it mean for God to be sovereign?

What would it mean for "things" to be "under" God's soveriegnty?

How has God been revealed to have exercised His sovereignty?

Where there any suprises in the way He did?

What would it mean for God to "not" be sovereign?

. . .

What does it mean for God to allow things that He does "not" want? What does "that" say about sovereignty?

. . .


(o)

Back to Top
 

selah
Registered Member




Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 1210
 
   Posted 5/4/2006 6:01 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
thanks everyone.

very helpful stuff.

sorry I don't have time to say more...




love,
selah

now, calling

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppphhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhiiiiiiii
devil devil devil devil where art thou?
Back to Top
 

Torkuda
Registered Member


Date Joined May 2006
Total Posts : 34
 
   Posted 5/13/2006 4:11 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Sovereign can indeed mean absolute power, but is rarely used to that extreme definition... in fact, unless we're talking about religious beliefs, its pretty much NEVER used in that fashion.
 
For instance, a "Sovereign" is a name for a human king.
 
State "Sovereignty" in the constitution refers to indepentant governing powers of the states
 
A king's sovereignty simply refers to his ability to rule the land he has dominion over.
 
I think the real question is actually, why does the usage of the word Sovereign suddenly change whenever addressing religious issues?
Back to Top
 

rsirkel
Registered Member


Date Joined May 2002
Total Posts : 183
 
   Posted 5/14/2006 8:44 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Torkuda
Could the answer be context?

Peace
Back to Top
 

Torkuda
Registered Member


Date Joined May 2006
Total Posts : 34
 
   Posted 5/14/2006 10:14 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

There we can agree. I respect the context of scripture. No I do not respect what I see as avoiding some scriptures wilst looking only at those you're comfortable with, to the point where you'll even ignore the context of the scriptures you like.

In Psalm 139, it constantly references God searching in every version. As far as the Calvinist idea, only in some versions does it actually say all of David's days were forordained.

In Genesis 18, not only does God say He has to go and see what is happening in Soddom and Gomorrah, but has a full feldged negotation with Abraham as though He didn't know what was coming.

In Exodus 32 God condemns and declares He will destroy all of Isreal, but then listens to Moses and says He repents of His intention.
 
In Jeremiah 18, God said if he promised bad things, and people repented, He would relent, if He promised good, and people turned to wickedness, He will reconsider His blessing.
 
In the garden, in Matthew 26, Mark 14 and Luke 22, Jesus begged to be shown another way, Jesus being God in the flesh, determined there was not.
 
How are these the actions of a completely, without any limitation, Omnipresent, Omniscient and Omnipotent God?
 
Even a Calvinist would say that God plans the absolute best for us, but if He has no limitation, then truely there is no such thing as the best for us, only what God wants for us. How then can we take comfort in our suffering, knowing ultimately, it is not God who rescues, but truely, it is God who persecutes? Does it not tell us to take comfort, and what is, is for the best?
Back to Top
 

rsirkel
Registered Member


Date Joined May 2002
Total Posts : 183
 
   Posted 5/20/2006 4:38 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Torkuda
Sorry to be so long in replying.
As I understand your reply, you are either questioning the Omni definitions regarding God. This because the scriptures you quoted as an example of your point, are not congruous with the Omni definitions of God's nature? Or you of the mind, what will be will be, a determinist? As your last question seemed to indicate. In any case then this board is a great place to work through some of your questions or see if your beliefs can stand.

Briefly, in my view scripture has to be understood as a story or narrative. I used to take the concordance approach and look up the words that I thought were important and try and get a deeper understanding with the Greek and Hebrew definitions. That didn't work and I really didn't grow in the knowledge of God. I ended up defensive about my perspective and not knowing really where I was located in the story of God. Systematic theology didn't help much regarding the questions of the nature of God and reality, unless you happen upon an unbiased theologian, but who knows who they are in the beginning of a students walk with God.

Covenant theology helps understand the context of the different accounts in scripture. For example, to see God acting or speaking within a covenant faithfulness
paradigm helps see how He intervenes for some and not for others, as one thread is questioning. Boyd's "Satan and the Problem of Evil" is very helpful. Have you read it?
I also like NT Wright and Richard Hays for getting the narrative approach and to begin understanding God's story.

I would like say more but I am still not quite sure if I understand the context from which you are speaking. If it is of interest to you how a Quaker can also be part reformed, part pentecostal, part open thiest, and part wine bibber. Visit my website at friendsrevival.org

Peace
Ron
Back to Top
 

Torkuda
Registered Member


Date Joined May 2006
Total Posts : 34
 
   Posted 5/20/2006 5:20 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

I don't know what my exact position is. This is why on my website (www.bibletruthseeker.com) I don't affiliate myself with any official denomination or theology.

Here are my core beliefs:

http://www.bibletruthseeker.com/My%20core%20beliefs.htm

On the omni words, yes I am quite opposed to them and their dominance http://www.bibletruthseeker.com/omni_words.htm

The reason I'm here on this forum is two fold. I'm first trying to sharpen my argueing skills since I really want to get my message out.

Second, I'm holding out that someone eventually listens enough to offer help themselves, or show me where I can find it. Amongst my family and friends, I am alone in my beliefs on the Bible. I know it is unwise to remain so. I'm hoping either someone out there has found the same things I have and is willing to help me in further study, or at least someone is willing to look at the research I've done and help me figure out where to go from here, taking the journey with me.

Back to Top
 

rsirkel
Registered Member


Date Joined May 2002
Total Posts : 183
 
   Posted 5/21/2006 12:49 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Hi Torkuda
Thanks for the honest reply. Probably most that post here as having embraced the "future does not exist" find themselves in the minority in their worship fellowships except for the Minnesota group. I agree, don't forsake the gathering.

The bible has both the good and the bad recorded but that does not mean the whole record is the "gospel". The gospel is powerful to save, the law is the knowledge of sin. Though the law is good it has served its purpose. Being truthful about the situation of man may not completely entail the whole truth as to the length and depths of the mercy and grace of God.

"Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul" by Hays is a good source to help re-read scripture through a different lens.

I trust your online fellowship will grow fruitful and be beneficial to yourself and others.

Peace
Ron
Back to Top
 

Clete
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2007
Total Posts : 35
 
   Posted 4/26/2008 10:57 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
To say that God is sovereign means simply that there is no higher authority in existence.

All authority belongs to and is delegated by God alone and He has the absolute ability to recall any delegated authority at will but will not do so if such action would be unjust or is in some other way inconsistent with the current description of His character.
Back to Top
 

jessemorrell
Registered Member


Date Joined Sep 2007
Total Posts : 77
 
   Posted 5/5/2008 4:12 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I find that very few distinguish between free will, omnipotence, and sovereignty. Usually it is the Calvinists who just clump them all together.

Free will: the ability to choose your own purpose.

Omnipotence: the ability to perform whatever you purpose.

Sovereignty: Being the final authority.

Man has a free will, but man cannot do anything (omnipotence).

And God is Sovereign, which does not mean He causes all things, it means that He is the final authority on all things.


For the Audience of One
Jesse Morrell

www.OpenAirOutreach.com

www.LibraryofTheology.com

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 5/5/2008 5:58 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
A definition that I really like, is, "Our world belongs to God!"
 
Our World Belongs to God
<script language=javascript> ac_therest[ac_therest.length] = "697"; </script>

As followers of Jesus Christ, living in this world—which some seek to control, but which others view with despair—we declare with joy and trust: Our world belongs to God!

—from the Preamble

We grant permission to download for personal use, a ministry setting, or classroom use provided that: no more than 100 copies are made; the material is distributed for free; and the copies include this credit line: © 1987, CRC Publications, Grand Rapids MI. www.crcna.org.

It's in the back of our gray church hymnal.

CHECK IT OUT, SELAH!

- Bruce


(o)

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 6:27 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads